Call Bridgeport.....(203) 386-9844
Danbury..........(203) 816-8476
Greenwich.....(203) 489-2952
Hartford.........(860) 785-6585

New Haven…..(203) 916-5796
New London…(860) 785-6581
Waterbury…….(203) 916-5785
Westport……….(203) 349-8154



Silver Golub & Teitell LLP (“SGT”) filed the first class action lawsuit in the United States against Philips-related entities in connection with the Philips Respironics CPAP, BiPAP, and mechanical ventilator recall announced on June 14, 2021. These devices have been recalled by Philips due to the health risks posed by a “sound abatement” polyurethane foam (“PE-PUR Foam”) used to absorb noise in these devices. SGT’s efforts on behalf of users of the recalled Philips devices has been featured in the Stamford Advocate and the New York Times.

Philips North America’s Dutch parent company Royal Philips announced the recall  of “specific Philips Bi-Level Positive Airway Pressure (Bi-Level PAP), Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) and mechanical ventilator devices” manufactured by its United States subsidiary Philips Respironics due to the risk that the PE-PUR Foam used to reduce noise in these devices may “off-gas certain chemicals” and “degrade into particles which may enter the device’s air pathway and be ingested or inhaled by the user” on June 14, 2021.

According to Philips, exposure to the PE-PUR Foam found in these devices could cause individuals to experience headaches, irritation, inflammation, respiratory issues, hypersensitivity, nausea, vomiting and possible toxic and carcinogenic effects, i.e., cancer. Philips advised users of the Recalled Devices to immediately stop using the devices and seek alternative treatments.

A list of devices subject to the recall (the “Recalled Devices”) can be found here.

To date, SGT has filed six class actions on behalf of users of recalled Philips Sleep Apnea machines and ventilators. The actions are Manna v. Koninklijke Philips N.V., et al., Case No. 1:21-cv-11017-DJC (D. Mass); Boudreau v. Philips North America, et al., Case No. 1:21-cv-11095-DJC (D. Mass); Hufnus v. Koninklijke Philips N.V., et al., Case No. 21-cv-11130-DJC (D. Mass); Bartley v. Koninklijke Philips N.V., et al., Case No. 1:21-cv-11206-DJC (D. Mass); Adkins v. Koninklijke Philips N.V., et al., Case No. 1:21-cv-11361-DJC (D. Mass); and Minder et al v. Koninklijke Philips N.V. et al., Case No. 21-cv-11563-DJC (D. Mass), which are pending in the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts.  Copies of the six complaints filed in this Philips CPAP class action can be found here, here, here, here, here and here.

On October 8, 2021, the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation transferred all actions related to the recall of Philips’ defective devices, including those filed by our firm, to the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania. The cases have been assigned to the Honorable Joy Flowers Conti for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings.

If you are, or were, a user of one of Recalled Devices manufactured by Philips and wish to discuss your rights in relation to the Philips CPAP class action, please contact Zachary Rynar by email at or by telephone at (203) 325-4491.

Zachary Rynar is an associate at Silver Golub & Teitell LLP, a law firm with offices in Stamford, New Haven, Hartford and Waterbury, Connecticut.

* Disclaimer: In various places on this website, references may have been made about Silver Golub & Teitell LLP’s past performance in the handling of client matters and/or Silver Golub & Teitell’s goal of providing exceptional representation to their clients. Connecticut’s Rules of Professional Responsibility prohibit attorneys from making claims that create an unjustified expectation in the lawyer’s ability to achieve particular results. Please note that past performance does not guarantee any future result for a client nor does the goal of providing exceptional representation differentiate this firm from any other.  Any references to Super Lawyers, the Super Lawyers “Top 50, The Best Lawyers in America and The Best Lawyers in America “Lawyer of the Year” contained in this website are not intended to suggest that our attorneys are superior to other attorneys practicing in Connecticut. For information on the Super Lawyers selection process, please click here.  For details on Super Lawyers magazine’s Connecticut selection statistics, please click here.  The Super Lawyers “Top 50″ list selection information can be found here.  The link to selection information for The Best Lawyers in America and The Best Lawyers in America “Lawyer of the Year” can be found here.
Attorney Advertising: This web site is designed for general information only. The information presented at this site should not be construed to be medical or formal legal advice nor the formation of a lawyer/client relationship.