Steven L. Bloch

Representative Matters in Co-Lead or Co-Counsel Role:

• Settlement on behalf of a certified class of investors in collateralized debt obligations (Dodona I, LLC v. Goldman, Sachs & Co. et al., S.D.N.Y., Case No. 10-cv-07497) ($27.5 million).
• Settlement on behalf of a certified nationwide class involving claims of civil RICO and fraud against The Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc. and affiliates concerning the Hartford’s structured settlements practices (Spencer v. The Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc. et al., D. Conn., Case No. 05-cv-1681) ($72.5 million).
• Settlement on behalf of a certified class of policyholders in West Virginia against Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company arising out of Nationwide’s failure to offer policyholders the ability to purchase statutorily-required optional levels of underinsured (“UIM”) and uninsured (“UM”) motorist coverage under automobile insurance policies (Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company v. O’Dell, Case No. 00-C-37, West Virginia Circuit Court, Roane County) ($75 million).
• Settlement on behalf of a certified class of policyholders in multiple states against United American Ins. Co. and certain agents and business affiliates concerning the sale of limited benefit health insurance (Smith v. Collinsworth et al., Circuit Court of Saline County, Arkansas, Case No. CV2004-72-2) ($30 million).
• Settlement on behalf of a certified class of policyholders in multiple states against AFLAC, Inc. concerning the improper adjustment of supplemental disability income policies (Becker v. American Family Life Assurance Company of Columbus and AFLAC, Inc., D.S.C., Case No. 05-2101) ($7 million).

Representative Complex Litigation Matters:

• Prosecution of an action by a card issuing bank against an internet service provider and its merchant bank for improper credit card transactions, resulting in a seven-figure settlement.
• Prosecution of an action involving the sale of a health-care industry software program, resulting in a seven-figure settlement.
• Successful defense and settlement (for a nominal sum) of an action by a major credit card brand against a card issuing bank, avoiding enforcement of a long-term contract predicated on price fixing and anticompetitive conduct.
• Successful defense and settlement (for a nominal sum) of an action for preliminary and permanent injunctive relief against a food equipment manufacturer alleging misappropriation of proprietary information and trade secrets and unfair competition.
• Successful defense of an action for a TRO and preliminary injunction seeking to enjoin construction of a multi-million dollar parking garage facility based on claims of interference with easement, real property and contractual rights.
• Successful prosecution of multiple actions by the Pennsylvania Insurance Commissioner on behalf of insurers in insolvency and liquidation proceedings.
• Successful defense and dismissal on summary judgment of a seven-figure claim alleging shareholder compensation, profits and retirement benefits in connection with a corporate shareholder agreement.

• The ‘bizarre’ twist in Clearview AI’s promised SCOTUS petition in biometric privacy case
• 7th Circ. Won’t Revisit Clearview BIPA Suit Remand
• Mylan Can’t Escape EpiPen Distributors’ Antitrust Claims
• 7th Circ. Won’t Keep Clearview BIPA Case In Federal Court
• Clearview BIPA Suit Moved Back To Ill. State Court
• Fantasy Players Take MLB Cheating Suit To 2nd Circ.
• Ill. Residents Want Clearview BIPA Suit Back In State Court
• Why Daily Fantasy Players Are Suing MLB Over Sign Stealing
• Google, YouTube Channels Sued Over Kids’ Data Collection

* Disclaimer: In various places on this website, references may have been made about Silver Golub & Teitell LLP’s past performance in the handling of client matters and/or Silver Golub & Teitell’s goal of providing exceptional representation to their clients. Connecticut’s Rules of Professional Responsibility prohibit attorneys from making claims that create an unjustified expectation in the lawyer’s ability to achieve particular results. Please note that past performance does not guarantee any future result for a client nor does the goal of providing exceptional representation differentiate this firm from any other.  Any references to Super Lawyers, the Super Lawyers “Top 50, The Best Lawyers in America and The Best Lawyers in America “Lawyer of the Year” contained in this website are not intended to suggest that our attorneys are superior to other attorneys practicing in Connecticut. For information on the Super Lawyers selection process, please click here.  For details on Super Lawyers magazine’s Connecticut selection statistics, please click here.  The Super Lawyers “Top 50″ list selection information can be found here.  The link to selection information for The Best Lawyers in America and The Best Lawyers in America “Lawyer of the Year” can be found here.

Attorney Advertising: This web site is designed for general information only. The information presented at this site should not be construed to be medical or formal legal advice nor the formation of a lawyer/client relationship.